<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Do You Want to Get Rich?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richscience.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/why-do-you-want-to-get-rich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richscience.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/why-do-you-want-to-get-rich/</link>
	<description>An Online Study of "The Science of Getting Rich" by Wallace Wattles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:59:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lyman Reed</title>
		<link>http://richscience.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/why-do-you-want-to-get-rich/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyman Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richscience.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/why-do-you-want-to-get-rich/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Fascinating, Mike... under 2 years!!!  I knew it was short, but under 2 years!  That&#039;s an eye opener...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating, Mike&#8230; under 2 years!!!  I knew it was short, but under 2 years!  That&#8217;s an eye opener&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike DeWitt</title>
		<link>http://richscience.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/why-do-you-want-to-get-rich/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike DeWitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richscience.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/why-do-you-want-to-get-rich/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Lyman,

That was the dirty little secret of early social security.  The average length of subsidized retirement was under two years, because people who had worked hard daily for 40-some years couldn&#039;t just stop and continue to exist.

More life to all.  That is the Certain Way test of our intentions, isn&#039;t it?  If what we want does not provide more life to all (or at least &#039;less to none&#039;), then we are not following the Certain Way.  I&#039;d never thought of things that way.  Thank you!

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyman,</p>
<p>That was the dirty little secret of early social security.  The average length of subsidized retirement was under two years, because people who had worked hard daily for 40-some years couldn&#8217;t just stop and continue to exist.</p>
<p>More life to all.  That is the Certain Way test of our intentions, isn&#8217;t it?  If what we want does not provide more life to all (or at least &#8216;less to none&#8217;), then we are not following the Certain Way.  I&#8217;d never thought of things that way.  Thank you!</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
